Fed’s Big Bang
-
bookmark
-
print
The FOMC cut policy rates by 50 bps on September 18, lowering the target range for the fed funds rate to 4.75%-to-5.00%. In the absence of a financial crisis or an economic calamity, this was a historically big way to begin a rate cut campaign. Chair Powell called it a “recalibration” designed to push “policy down over time to a more neutral level” and, in a manner “to make sure that we don’t fall behind”. Tellingly, Powell said if the Fed had the July employment report in hand for the previous FOMC confab (it was released two days later), “we might have well” cut rates at the time. In some respect, September’s move was a catch-up for a missed July 31 action.
Powell said: “As inflation has declined and the labor market has cooled, the upside risks to inflation have diminished and the downside risks to employment have increased. We now see the risks to achieving our employment and inflation goals as roughly in balance, and we are attentive to the risks to both sides of our dual mandate.” And to prevent tipping the balance of risk, inflation and labour market performance on the ground now necessitates a more neutral policy stance.
Fed’s Big Bang
Deputy Chief Economist and Managing Director
Michael is part of the team responsible for forecasting and analyzing the North American economy and financial markets. He has spent his career working in either ec…
Michael is part of the team responsible for forecasting and analyzing the North American economy and financial markets. He has spent his career working in either ec…
VIEW FULL PROFILE- Minute Read
- Listen Stop
- Text Bigger | Text Smaller
The FOMC cut policy rates by 50 bps on September 18, lowering the target range for the fed funds rate to 4.75%-to-5.00%. In the absence of a financial crisis or an economic calamity, this was a historically big way to begin a rate cut campaign. Chair Powell called it a “recalibration” designed to push “policy down over time to a more neutral level” and, in a manner “to make sure that we don’t fall behind”. Tellingly, Powell said if the Fed had the July employment report in hand for the previous FOMC confab (it was released two days later), “we might have well” cut rates at the time. In some respect, September’s move was a catch-up for a missed July 31 action.
Powell said: “As inflation has declined and the labor market has cooled, the upside risks to inflation have diminished and the downside risks to employment have increased. We now see the risks to achieving our employment and inflation goals as roughly in balance, and we are attentive to the risks to both sides of our dual mandate.” And to prevent tipping the balance of risk, inflation and labour market performance on the ground now necessitates a more neutral policy stance.
You might also be interested in
IN Tune: The AI + Data Center Build Out: Sustainability Impacts, Second Order Beneficiaries
Food, Ag, Fertilizer, and ESG From BMO’s 19th Annual Farm to Market Conference: BMO Equity Research
IN Tune: Food, Ag, Fertilizer, and ESG From BMO’s 19th Annual Farm to Market Conference
Federal Budget 2024: Capital Gains Taxes Climb; Some Nuggets for Entrepreneurs
Inaugural BMO Obesity Summit Focuses on Therapeutics and Combating a Growing Epidemic
BMO Blue Book: U.S. Economy is Resilient but Predicted to Slow in Early 2024
The Age of Transparency: Companies Poised to Benefit as Reporting Rules Tighten
Breaking Down the Food Waste Problem: Big Inefficiencies = Big Opportunity
ESG Thoughts of the Week from BMO Equity Research: Wildfire Risk, CAT Losses Increasing
Food, Ag, Fertilizer, and ESG From BMO’s 18th Annual Farm to Market Conference
Energy Transition Will Require Collaboration Between Miners and End-Users
Will 2023 be the Year of Gold: World Gold Council at BMO Conference
Top Rankings for BMO Capital Markets' FICC Macro Strategy Group in Institutional Investor Client Survey
The Market Transition from COVID-19 has Begun: Belski to BMO Metals and Mining Conference